From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18407 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2010 03:29:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 18394 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2010 03:29:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:29:19 +0000 Received: from wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o2J3TF4T018097 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:29:16 +0100 Received: from wwc33 (wwc33.prod.google.com [10.241.241.161]) by wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o2J3TEHE004089 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:29:14 -0700 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so1444948wwc.21 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:29:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.130 with SMTP id y2mr315073wee.51.1268969353594; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:29:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100318221601.F233684413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270 From: Doug Evans To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Doug Evans wrote: > >> +setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-linux*" > > What will happen for i686-*-linux* --enable-64-bit-bfd (running tests with > -m64)? =A0What about x86_64 running tests with -m32? =A0Both i?86-* and > x86_64-* can cover both 32-bit and 64-bit configurations. > > What you want is (IA32 or x86_64 GNU/Linux) and (64-bit multilib), I > think. =A0In GCC such tests would use the lp64 effective-target, but I do= n't > know what the GDB equivalent is. I run 64x32 tests regularly here. The way I do it is to hack site.exp to set host_triplet, etc. to i686-linux. Done this way, nothing further is needed, in so far as handling {32,64}-cross-{64,x32}. [I'm leaving as a separate discussion whether we need to xfail these for i686-linux too. It passes here, but I gather it fails with more recent glibc's]