From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16034 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 23:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 16025 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 23:42:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:42:21 +0000 Received: from kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.79]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o2INgHlO014660 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:42:18 +0100 Received: from wwb24 (wwb24.prod.google.com [10.241.241.88]) by kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o2INgG94017499 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:42:16 -0700 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1365419wwb.16 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.163.207 with SMTP id a57mr94406wel.220.1268955736026; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003182233.o2IMXAYO003057@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <20100318221601.F233684413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <201003182233.o2IMXAYO003057@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270 From: Doug Evans To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00710.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT) >> From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) >> >> Anyone mind if I mark these as kfail for amd64? > > What makes you think these fail on *all* amd64 platforms? I don't. Revised patch submitted.