From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9309 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2010 00:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9299 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2010 00:15:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:14:58 +0000 Received: from kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.83]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o2B0EuC1026885 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:14:56 -0800 Received: from wwi14 (wwi14.prod.google.com [10.241.243.14]) by kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o2B0Et6P011695 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:14:55 -0800 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so342662wwi.10 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:14:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.3 with SMTP id a3mr1038949wem.212.1268266494781; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:14:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B98352E.4020603@vmware.com> References: <20100310235324.7B3288439C@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <4B98352E.4020603@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] lengthen timeouts in gdb.base/checkpoint.exp From: Doug Evans To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Michael Snyder wrote: > I'm ok with the timeout part. =A0Are you really changing the number > of checkpoints, or was the comment already obsolete? Yeah, the comment was obsolete. I didn't change anything other than lengthen the timeout for that part of the test.