From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6104 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6094 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2009 22:36:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:35:59 +0000 Received: from wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.85]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id nB7MZuRK028877 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 22:35:57 GMT Received: from ewy1 (ewy1.prod.google.com [10.241.103.1]) by wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id nB7MZGX8006066 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:35:54 -0800 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1994021ewy.28 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:35:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.66 with SMTP id x44mr2691524wee.96.1260225352887; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:35:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200912072142.nB7LgL1a003385@greed.delorie.com> References: <20091203161906.7f7a6c06@redhat.com> <20091204173837.GD2891@adacore.com> <20091207133912.3e97099d@redhat.com> <20091207205641.GA30964@caradoc.them.org> <200912072120.nB7LKksp002963@greed.delorie.com> <20091207212849.GA455@caradoc.them.org> <200912072142.nB7LgL1a003385@greed.delorie.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for Renesas RX architecture From: Doug Evans To: DJ Delorie Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:42 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I took a look. =A0It's a little opaque (I don't suppose there's >> documentation on what opc2c does somewhere), but I get the drift. > > Not really, I took it out of the m32c simulator. =A0I'm hoping to find > time to adapt the m32c opcodes to use it instead of cgen (cgen wasn't > a good fit for a variable-length isa), I'd have to write docs at that > point. I look at it differently. It's not that cgen isn't a good fit. Rather, it's that such support was always planned, it just needed someone to add it. [I have a sandbox at home that does exactly this and I'm testing it now.]