From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2837 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 20:46:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 2828 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 20:46:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:45:56 +0000 Received: from spaceape11.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape11.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.145]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n7IKjrlx020066 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:45:54 -0700 Received: from yxe36 (yxe36.prod.google.com [10.190.2.36]) by spaceape11.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n7IKiblD017519 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:45:51 -0700 Received: by yxe36 with SMTP id 36so5173707yxe.21 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:45:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.113.13 with SMTP id l13mr8852211ybc.248.1250628350158; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:45:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090818163754.GA16719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090817194531.GA10694@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20090818163754.GA16719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Fix hw watchpoints From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:24:00 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: >> Have you looked at whether gdbserver has similar issues? > > No. > > http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2009-q2/msg00084.html > On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:42:48 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > # On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:55:49, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > # > May I ask why do you put effort both on linux-nat.c and gdbserver? = =A0Isn't it > # > cheaper to unify the codebase and start (transparently) using gdbserv= er even > # > for local operations? > # > # Probably, I think we're slowly going in that direction. =A0Making the > # debug interface control parts of gdbserver into a library and reuse > # it from gdb for native debugging (code sharing, that is) as been > # suggested many times. > > Expecting currently I should copy the changes also to gdb/gdbserver/ . = =A0Is it > OK to first get them approved for linux-nat.c & co. ? Ah, righto.