From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9479 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 17:53:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 9471 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 17:53:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:52:56 +0000 Received: from spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n61HqrRB012643 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:52:54 -0700 Received: from yxe27 (yxe27.prod.google.com [10.190.2.27]) by spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n61HqoC3031612 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:52:51 -0700 Received: by yxe27 with SMTP id 27so1865048yxe.0 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:52:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.101.17 with SMTP id y17mr4059192agb.117.1246470770667; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zlbo2t2p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <200906222035.48910.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8363ed3xkx.fsf@gnu.org> <83zlbo2t2p.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings. From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > This text seems to say that we will print a warning when symbols are >> > loaded ``implicitly'', whatever that means. =A0But in fact, aren't the >> > warnings issued for files that have _no_ debugging symbols at all? >> >> s/implicitly loads symbols for files/tries to load symbols for a file >> and finds the file has no symbols/ >> ? > > I suggest this variant: > > =A0The @code{set print symbol-loading-warnings} command allows you to > =A0enable or disable printing of warning messages when @value{GDBN} > =A0loads an executable or a library that has no debugging symbols. > > WDYT? Sounds great. Thanks. I think we're all set then. Does anyone have any other concerns with the patch?