From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10387 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 03:47:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 10378 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 03:47:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:47:11 +0000 Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n613l8JI019305 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:47:08 -0700 Received: from yxe41 (yxe41.prod.google.com [10.190.2.41]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n613l6TN008321 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:47:06 -0700 Received: by yxe41 with SMTP id 41so862444yxe.20 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:47:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.74.7 with SMTP id w7mr7891771aga.33.1246420026050; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:47:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8363ed3xkx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <200906222035.48910.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8363ed3xkx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings. From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:49:25 -0700 >> From: Doug Evans >> Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches , >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Pedro Alves >> >> Eli, are the docs ok? > > The text is okay, but I'm not sure it is accurate wrt the implementation. > >> +The @code{set print symbol-loading-warnings} command allows you to enab= le or >> +disable printing of warning messages when @value{GDBN} implicitly loads= symbols >> +for files. > > This text seems to say that we will print a warning when symbols are > loaded ``implicitly'', whatever that means. =A0But in fact, aren't the > warnings issued for files that have _no_ debugging symbols at all? s/implicitly loads symbols for files/tries to load symbols for a file and finds the file has no symbols/ ?