From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8219 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 22:20:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8211 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2009 22:20:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:20:50 +0000 Received: from zps75.corp.google.com (zps75.corp.google.com [172.25.146.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5UMKjWS025358 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:46 +0100 Received: from gxk7 (gxk7.prod.google.com [10.202.11.7]) by zps75.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5UMJva7030916 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:20:43 -0700 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so748878gxk.18 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:20:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.120.17 with SMTP id s17mr7636846agc.94.1246400442240; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:20:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200906302256.40646.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <200906222035.48910.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200906302256.40646.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings. From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00907.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:49:25, Doug Evans wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Pedro Alves wr= ote: >> > On Monday 22 June 2009 18:52:40, Tom Tromey wrote: >> >=A0I like gdb's output with >> > Doug's suggestion. >> >> So we have two yeas and zero nays. > > To be clear, that referred to the making "gdb program" print > something (passing !batch as is_atty flag in main.c). =A0I haven't > really looked at the patch or the rest of the suggestion > carefully. =A0:-) Righto. I took Tom's email as approval of the patch, his only concern was to wait to let people comment on the output. But if you want the patch to wait for more review, ok.