From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31270 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2009 19:10:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 31262 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2009 19:10:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:10:39 +0000 Received: from spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5OJAZwB000933 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:10:36 +0100 Received: from gxk5 (gxk5.prod.google.com [10.202.11.5]) by spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5OJAXJd004161 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:10:33 -0700 Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so1675937gxk.6 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.49.8 with SMTP id w8mr1327556agw.22.1245870631957; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A4278C9.8050609@qnx.com> References: <200906222346.54263.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4A40F226.4080909@qnx.com> <200906231700.12402.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4A427584.2090908@qnx.com> <4A4278C9.8050609@qnx.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] gdbserver: Add support for Z0/Z1 packets From: Doug Evans To: Aleksandar Ristovski Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > Never ment to say it isn't important, just that "insert_point" didn't look > more clear to me. =A0But that's just me, of course. Righto. insert_point has the feature that it doesn't suggest solely one or the othe= r. Maybe insert_bw_point? [b =3D break, w =3D watch] Dunno. I don't have too strong an opinion on the replacement (naming is hard), but I do feel the status quo is going to trip people up.