From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22883 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2009 19:04:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 22875 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2009 19:04:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:04:05 +0000 Received: from spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.144]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5IJ419h003686 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:04:02 -0700 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (ywm5.prod.google.com [10.192.13.5]) by spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5IJ3w74001789 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:58 -0700 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so499964ywm.12 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.138.7 with SMTP id l7mr2519045and.141.1245351837783; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000601c9e988$ff5dc810$fe195830$@u-strasbg.fr> References: <20090430071853.99F5584890@localhost> <001201c9d860$e66c5850$b34508f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9e3d4$218eac20$64ac0460$@u-strasbg.fr> <002001c9e468$273842a0$75a8c7e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000601c9e988$ff5dc810$fe195830$@u-strasbg.fr> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] i386/amd64 h/w watchpoints in gdbserver From: Doug Evans To: Pierre Muller , Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Pierre Muller wro= te: >> > make: *** [check] Error 1 >> > >> > I got the same results with cygwin gdb itself... >> > >> > I am currently investigating the two failures >> > above and I will come back to this in another email. >> >> Hi. =A0For clarification, are these failures regressions, or do the >> tests still fail without the patch? > > =A0Not really, as these two tests are only run > if the target supports hardware watchpoints. > =A0This means that current gdbserver from CVS HEAD > would skip that test. > > Anyhow, I think that there are problems with the gdb.threads/watchthreads= 2.c > code with cygwin. > =A0When run directly, this code should write a bunch of thread switches a= nd > exit, > but I seems to freeze... Ping.