From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11586 invoked by alias); 31 May 2009 22:23:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 11578 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2009 22:23:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:23:40 +0000 Received: from zps37.corp.google.com (zps37.corp.google.com [172.25.146.37]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n4VMNbe6030700 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 15:23:37 -0700 Received: from gxk2 (gxk2.prod.google.com [10.202.11.2]) by zps37.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n4VMNZKW008239 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 15:23:35 -0700 Received: by gxk2 with SMTP id 2so1726670gxk.8 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 15:23:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.81.11 with SMTP id e11mr4562444agb.110.1243808299335; Sun, 31 May 2009 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200905312308.04692.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <200905310013.38916.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905312308.04692.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 22:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support. From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00673.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I guess "info inferiors" would show all the checkpointed forks for a >> given inferior? > > That's one option, sure. =A0I haven't given much attention to user > interface details of checkpoints. =A0Another idea we be to just flag that > there are checkpoints available, and then the user can do the usual > "info checkpoints" to see them. =A0This avoids having a too crowded > "info inferiors" output. Other targets (e.g. simulators) may have checkpoints that have nothing to do with multiple inferiors, so fwiw I think they should be kept separate.