From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27187 invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 23:16:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 27178 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2009 23:16:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 23:15:59 +0000 Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n4DNFtwk008185 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 00:15:56 +0100 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (andd14.prod.google.com [10.100.30.14]) by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n4DNFrGT027753 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:15:54 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so345646and.26 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:15:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.227.18 with SMTP id z18mr2125240ang.49.1242256205512; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000901c9d418$f187c400$d4974c00$@u-strasbg.fr> References: <000601c9d348$92580d80$b7082880$@u-strasbg.fr> <200905131533.n4DFXcvm019686@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <000901c9d418$f187c400$d4974c00$@u-strasbg.fr> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 23:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC-v2] Remove i386 low level debug register function from nm- header file. From: Doug Evans To: Pierre Muller Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Pierre Muller wr= ote: > Hi Doug, > =A0I answered in > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-05/msg00006.html > but as there was a month change between the two emails... > they are not linked in the archives :( > > =A0Could you combine my suggested changes to your patch? Ya. Sorry 'bout leaving that part out! At least I didn't forget its ChangeLog entry, sigh. [It was in my sandbox at the time.] I can resubmit but it's pretty straightforward - your version looks an awful lot like mine. :-) I'll certainly include that part when checked in. If I don't Pedro can slap me again in irc. :-) I still need an official "ok" to check it in.