Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information

Pedro Alves
2009-01-13T19:47:05Z

On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:37:25, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > is free to change the symbol it uses for this any time, and use the
> > __uid_t one for something utterly incompatible.  Since the name begins
> > with 2 underscores, the library implementation doesn't need to bother
> > being back-compatible, because such names are off-limits for user code.
>
> No, it is allowed to assume that the type name will not collide with
> any user defined type.  It's only about namespace, that's all.  Things will
> surelly break if the type changes to something else incompatible.

Oh well, I think I said the same thing you did anyway. :-)

--
Pedro Alves