Re: [RFA] amd64 displaced stepping support

Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-01-28T14:34:59Z

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 03:31:38PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> I don't disagree that libopcodes is a reasonable place.
>
> I'm assuming by "example of this" you're refering to
> branch_delay_insns, target, target2, etc. Right? This is great
> stuff, but it's in a struct named "disassemble_info". :-) IWBN if
> libopcodes could provide a more generic interface, and long term an
> interface more suitable to general use (i.e. not restricted to the
> confines of gdb/binutils releases).

Oh, yes. Completely agreed - although I think it's going to look a
lot like a disassembler, anyway.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery