From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4635 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2008 16:55:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4626 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2008 16:55:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:55:32 +0000 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m3HGtQuE003315 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:55:27 +0100 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wri57.prod.google.com [10.54.9.57]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m3HGskPZ023532 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:55:25 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so151652wri.12 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.241.15 with SMTP id o15mr1737627wah.164.1208451325059; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.107.18 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:28:00 -0000 From: "Doug Evans" To: "GDB Patches" , ARistovski@qnx.com Subject: Re: [RFA] patch for DW_AT_comp_dir/DW_AT_name vs .debug_line inconsistencies In-Reply-To: <20080417160229.GE17488@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080417160229.GE17488@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > +static void > > +watch_main_source_file_lossage () > > (void), please. Is that because of -Wstrict-prototypes/-Wold-style-definition?