From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15369 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2008 22:52:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 15361 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2008 22:52:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:51:48 +0000 Received: from zps38.corp.google.com (zps38.corp.google.com [172.25.146.38]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m1EMpg0r014212 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:42 -0800 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wra68.prod.google.com [10.54.1.68]) by zps38.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m1EMpfRF025607 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:42 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so842058wra.13 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.79.1 with SMTP id g1mr2246111wal.43.1203029500540; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.107.7 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:52:00 -0000 From: "Doug Evans" To: "Eli Zaretskii" Subject: Re: [RFA] new command to search memory Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080214021915.F3FE51C72F0@localhost> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:19:15 -0800 (PST) > > From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) > > > > > I didn't get a response to the non-doc portions of this patch. > > [Eli, thanks for the doc review, I made the suggested changes, > > though I went a different route in shortening the length of the > > line specifying the find command syntax. The end result is still > > rather short.] > > You mean, rather long... > > The patch is okay with me, but could you (or someone else) please see > whether these two long lines > > > > +@item find @r{[}/@var{sn}@r{]} @var{start_addr}, @@@var{len}, @var{val1} @r{[}, @var{val2}, @dots{}@r{]} > > +@itemx find @r{[}/@var{sn}@r{]} @var{start_addr}, @var{end_addr}, @var{val1} @r{[}, @var{val2}, @dots{}@r{]} > > survive the typesetting for the printed manual (either by TeX or > pdftex) without overflowing the page margin? I'm afraid they will > overflow, since the items of this table are typeset with @code, and > @code specifies a chunk of monospaced font that cannot be broken > between lines. Is looking at gdb.pdf (created with cd doc && make gdb.pdf) sufficient?