From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27716 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 15:51:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 27687 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 15:51:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:51:34 +0000 Received: from zps36.corp.google.com (zps36.corp.google.com [172.25.146.36]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m0TFpVlM005845 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:51:31 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rvfc27.prod.google.com [10.140.180.27]) by zps36.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m0TFpF1Y015520 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:51:31 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so1889858rvf.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.133.10 with SMTP id g10mr4481567rvd.151.1201621891011; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.186.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:51:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:04:00 -0000 From: "Doug Evans" To: "Pierre Muller" Subject: Re: [BUG] BINOP_DIV and ptyp command Cc: "Joel Brobecker" , "GDB Patches" In-Reply-To: <000e01c86249$89870100$9c950300$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <002301c85c12$a73a4640$f5aed2c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20080129064148.GB16288@adacore.com> <000e01c86249$89870100$9c950300$@u-strasbg.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00680.txt.bz2 On Jan 28, 2008 11:35 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > > By the way, Doug patch is also not correct because > even though the signed integer division is caught > in value_binop, the corresponding unsigned code > is still missing the same check. Fix one bug, expose another ... The latter bug's existence is not a proof one way or another that any patch to the former bug is or isn't correct.