Re: [RFA] make gdb.base/sigall.c more robust

Doug Evans
2008-01-28T23:48:38Z

Ping ...

On Jan 17, 2008 3:31 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> One environment in which I run the gdb testsuite has a few signals blocked
> at the start. If tcl/expect/bash had the ability to unblock signals it might
> be preferable to unblock the signals there (I couldn't find any),
> but OTOH testcases should be reasonably robust.
>
> 2008-01-17 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>
> * gdb.base/sigall.c (main): Ensure all signals aren't blocked.
>
> Index: sigall.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.2 sigall.c
> --- sigall.c 28 Jun 1999 16:04:02 -0000 1.1.1.2
> +++ sigall.c 17 Jan 2008 23:18:55 -0000
> @@ -1581,6 +1581,18 @@ main ()
> set_debug_traps ();
> breakpoint ();
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef SIG_SETMASK
> + /* Ensure all the signals aren't blocked.
> + The environment in which the testsuite is run may have blocked some
> + for whatever reason. */
> + {
> + sigset_t newset;
> + sigemptyset (&newset);
> + sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, &newset, NULL);
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> signal (SIGABRT, handle_ABRT);
> #ifdef SIGHUP
> signal (SIGHUP, handle_HUP);
>