From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5500 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2016 17:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5364 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2016 17:45:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:45:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461013F741; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9QHjDLo019643; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:45:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove single-step breakpoint for GDBserver internal event To: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1474856716-5913-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1474856716-5913-2-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1474856716-5913-2-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00726.txt.bz2 On 09/26/2016 03:25 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > This patch removes single-step breakpoints if the event is only > GDBserver internal, IOW, isn't reported back to GDB. Can you expand on rationale? Why does being internal matter? The rest of the series looks fine to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves