From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QRnJBAynumBVUgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 18:19:56 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 05DF61F163; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:19:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C59B1E813 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:19:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7439A1834 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 22:19:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (mail-wr1-f46.google.com [209.85.221.46]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D79F3857C68 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 22:19:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6D79F3857C68 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id y7so6052740wrh.7 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=q5bEwDua1TsrYYK79/RGAmoknDY29gN05vYY0P3syZM=; b=eFQf0b16in4Fn5mhcQTDfghO9Zj+RulHh6ynJ9AatOdBkYrlctjcNrAmNf/NT7+Og7 2ngh7YQWtXU1FaigkR5VX2lzTDjtA6N7vCG2c/yLvw/RUPP1qZuQ6I0Re3iqlhGoKf/i youGnaDHzr+v/M2/x73M33ArIHFPPHjUcpDxq7/OF1bDYWGobi2gpwAvShYdZvxCvUDN o3gnVpjtxywoKsv9Plf8etAArBiVRnPgFRo6Ov1GDiEwurd1gWEnK11ALYnoIq30T5ZT akEcAZ+WGVrJavZbyVAZzzTVjBegYigLzsY9s9RQx047Tprh+1J8TN1EaY9rqpvP8tIf gEUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ravlYP87ZUkc8HM6v7m59ztyNpiBFIrhHaFT79aDzCP2aX8NU 0TDVxy1BYESKxBqozhDgLjc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVcR4DAhk3980srZuBhErd3sVZwaf8lxqh4KdqR2LXpF603PwJ8igylT93TCKxYAToB1ERdw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d81:: with SMTP id p1mr5715731wre.287.1622845182500; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f932:6a00:6b6e:c7b6:c5a7:aac3? ([2001:8a0:f932:6a00:6b6e:c7b6:c5a7:aac3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k16sm6590879wmr.42.2021.06.04.15.19.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] Initial TUI mouse support From: Pedro Alves To: Hannes Domani , Simon Marchi , Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches , Tom Tromey , Joel Brobecker References: <20210603151453.15248-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> <20210603151453.15248-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> <87r1hhoi03.fsf@tromey.com> <1760297979.5212997.1622816480782@mail.yahoo.com> <0936428e-80c4-c192-cdfd-817ff9bcfab0@palves.net> <45415d6f-45f8-c709-5a21-dd2b02e724f3@polymtl.ca> <1973192944.5331642.1622841335261@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 23:19:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1973192944.5331642.1622841335261@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-06-04 10:15 p.m., Hannes Domani wrote: > Am Freitag, 4. Juni 2021, 22:31:31 MESZ hat Pedro Alves Folgendes geschrieben: >> I'm surprised to find that clicking a window doesn't set focus on it, though. >> Is that supposed to work? > > No, that's not implemented. > I was thinking about it, but wasn't sure what people prefer. > So I just kept the simpler variant. I would prefer being able to click to select. Clicking things and nothing happening seems like a waste of actions. :-) If different people prefer different things, that calls for a setting/option. Maybe some people might prefer focus-follow-mouse? (not me.) Pedro Alves