From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110525 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2019 09:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 81916 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2019 09:15:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:588 X-HELO: mail-wm1-f50.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f50.google.com) (209.85.128.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:15:40 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id v19so1450838wmj.5 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i9sm15479934wmf.43.2019.06.05.02.15.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 02:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Let's discuss moving gdbserver to top-level To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190530213046.20542-1-tom@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190530213046.20542-1-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 On 5/30/19 10:30 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > I've wanted to move gdbserver to the top-level for a while now. I > think it will provide a decent benefit, mainly by letting gdb and > gdbserver share their libiberty, gnulib, and "common" libraries -- > shaving off some build time. It also will have the nice side effect > of simplifying gdbserver's Makefile, fixing some existing bugs. > > > Let me know what you think. I think this is a good idea; I'm for this general direction. But you knew that already. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves