From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id bIdpNYjzDmANCAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:24 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D147D1EF80; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:24 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE101E945 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955D1385701E; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:36:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 955D1385701E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611592583; bh=OFXTAGROtzlQIUcGE1/AytWgvlUmhfmJjLAnmrvKcJc=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=v4TI1KC/DlLhAwimP2pZinxT2Q7sWADU0SdPXoL1tlULKnZMhEWy9tgn8aPbNJC9T 8uj7OsICucg8O+YI9H5tVE6tQLpfDRI0QsSUb0Hq1rr+w7nRS3wIC1Tq5nh8YdbcqQ ROWDEFI5fr0T0RJRL7/GsJjYdS6WczJTN3MnXMrY= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E706385781A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:36:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3E706385781A Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10PGaCpW022804 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:17 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 10PGaCpW022804 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAFC41E945; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Handle DW_AT_ranges with DW_FORM_sec_off in partial DIE To: Bernd Edlinger , Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210125122444.GA15885@delia> <56f38801-477e-fa38-5e16-22a4ed73437c@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:36:12 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Tom Tromey Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Yes, unfortunately I have not any experience with writing such assembly > tests, but I am always impressed when one of you does it though :-) > > Nevertheless, the test case seems to be stable from gcc-4.8 .. gcc-11, > that it fails without the patch and passes with the patch. > > So is it okay to push my partial symbols test as-is? My patch here adds a test that uses DW_FORM_sec_offset to point to a .debug_rnglists (DWARF5) section. Maybe that's sufficient, but if not I could probably do a DWARF4 equivalent. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-January/175229.html Simon