From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id V/SQD9t671+OSgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 14:41:15 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 333891F0AA; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:41:15 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7033E1E590 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:41:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8982384640D; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 19:41:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8982384640D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1609530073; bh=fkIa439UjLgV4wXVsiM24AQRja2vZ2PM9XD+Z/Xu2cE=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=NP3a6i8qgjo660iN6s/yVMh2/s/caORpe7Lcvv4LBVFnOyY53TtJIxxWbQo6xjj3u E0BUothSoYl9D8WA2FGQUUFJ6gKsJC8+mnU1ghP5IID2dKOpmGK+QG9PEx0oSXfUKA C6SGtFXWSEYeub5k5AHtMwjdFJtzYwGNzbUYuwsI= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D42F6384640D for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 19:41:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D42F6384640D Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 101Jf2jq023243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:41:07 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 101Jf2jq023243 Received: from [10.0.0.213] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 982711E590; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:41:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Fix range end handling of inlined subroutines To: Bernd Edlinger , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:41:01 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 1 Jan 2021 19:41:02 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-01-01 4:57 a.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > this is the main part of the patch, which fixes the range end handling, > and depends on the is_weak line table flag from the previous patch. > > I moved the entry_pc handling fix to a follow-up patch, as the > test cases do not depend on it. > > > Thanks > Bernd. > This patch depends on the other one ("Introduce a new line table flag is_weak"), right? Could you send it as a series? Normally, that's easily done using git-send-email, although you don't seem to use git-send-email. Simon