Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>> > Well I guess mi-var-cmd.exp.  Please remember that I'm not the
>> > maintainer
>> > but just an interested party.  See what Daniel says.  He might want
>> > something for mi2-var-cmd.exp too.
>> 
>> Ok, I'll wait for his comment.
> 
> mi-var-cmd.exp sounds good to me.  I don't think we need it in
> mi2-var-cmd.exp.  I have the same question I asked a moment ago about
> Nick's patch - is there any chance that someone relies on this
> information?
> 
> Here I think the chance is pretty slim; for pointers it's a more
> serious concern, but for functions this is a pretty rare case.
> So not versioning this change makes sense to me.

The new version of the patch, with testsuite change, is attached.

Changelog:
2006-03-15 Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
        
        * c-valprint.c 
         (c_val_print): Don't print type prefix for functions.
         (c_value_print): Print type prefix for functions here.
        * testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: Test for new behaviour.



- Volodya