From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98814 invoked by alias); 3 May 2016 20:59:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 98801 invoked by uid 89); 3 May 2016 20:59:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=proposing X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:59:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07404C057EC7; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u43KxATf017703; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:59:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.11/PR 20039] Use target_terminal_ours_for_output in MI To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1462304994-14215-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 20:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462304994-14215-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On 05/03/2016 08:49 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > From: Pedro Alves > > I am proposing that we backport this patch to fix PR 20039. I will send > another patch containing a test I wrote. Is it useful to put it in the 7.11 > branch as well as master? Can't hurt, and it'll help make sure further backports don't regress this issue in the branch. Thanks, Pedro Alves