Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gdb: make remote target clear its async event handler in wait
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:00:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df91c2c5-8696-a16a-a8b2-268d807af6a1@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130165251.830482-3-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

On 30/11/20 16:52, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:

> However, the code in remote_async_inferior_event_handler checks for for

s/for for/for/

> pending events in addition to whether the stop reply queue is empty, so
> I've made remote_target::wait check for that as well.  I'm not
> completely sure this is ok, since I don't understand very well yet how
> the pending events mechanism works.  But I figured it was safer to do
> this in order to avoid missing events, worst case it just leads to
> unnecessary calls to remote_target::wait.

It won't hurt, but I think it shouldn't be necessary -- if putpkt_binary or
getpkt_or_notif_sane_1 see a notification (search for '%'), we end up in
handle_notification, which marks state->get_pending_events_token, which
then leads us to:

 -> remote_async_get_pending_events_handler
  -> remote_notif_get_pending_events
   -> remote_notif_stop_ack
    -> remote_target::push_stop_reply
     -> mark_async_event_handler (rs->remote_async_inferior_event_token);

which then ends up in target_target::wait.

I don't recall exactly why I had to put the check for the pending
event in remote_async_inferior_event_handler, though.  Maybe it was
necessary because events auto-cleared back then.

Anyhow, this LGTM.  Patches #3 and #4 LGTM too.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 16:52 [PATCH 0/4] Clear target async event handlers in wait method Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-30 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] gdb: make async event handlers clear themselves Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-24 17:26   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-04 17:42   ` Pedro Alves
2021-02-04 18:15     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-30 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb: make remote target clear its async event handler in wait Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-24 17:23   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-12-24 17:44     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-02-04 18:00   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2021-02-04 18:34     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-30 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] gdb: make record-btrace " Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-06  9:50   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-11-30 16:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] gdb: make record-full " Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-06  9:51   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-12-23 21:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] Clear target async event handlers in wait method Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df91c2c5-8696-a16a-a8b2-268d807af6a1@palves.net \
    --to=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox