From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QFAEOTWuaGXEgBMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:45:57 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JM49V4sr; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E4F7E1E11B; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:45:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76211E091 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:45:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4BC385AE41 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 140ED3858D32 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:45:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 140ED3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 140ED3858D32 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701359145; cv=none; b=vTHDevUrZMSopjQT812MYJhxAI5vG+aIjdxpMf+Z5fG2xBd+rsEOnAEmvAsvTgyx37tfPtIDAxEXUVWgrHxpao5a7lr8l0ydBXZNKCyck2aKVuUeIxZou6085pO7kJpAcFE+FDiFHuZvP7AbMg9zJUMYw3fN33A7qaMHTxGWuL8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701359145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6ubX7TdsjdDxJVAZ8uhgz+8cv3GmGoPQt+wTLi0seAg=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=NkT3B6WXW6LVuPcuCJkZmOFz6AKHU0yU2aRhNyhz7WMgdgIXLGFrqhSph0ZFzxlY4XW03HWpuLKiyupX2U2swQnjYboooxJ3JMWCQRv2B5ys6z5Z1gJfdh5JLNDX56V9l+GJooc0oQUekP4BxpfvQZ0H2C3DlFAtmSWbJa1WJOU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701359143; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zI+KacwTeVOP3vAvbZdYEAoyXrMF1jDG+JSpeeTCGcc=; b=JM49V4srx3HdjWw9Hi0h9nQy0Kmdji1wW2tdee22n+a7S1hCBXUaZP37kXmBV22ZzpGS93 PqJdJH3phVL70jN0U3zn4y7Clj0Xdpaz+nDJKIU0esEO8Wm2Uth/hRcpputZADTPaz5W2K Ck4gzEhBlovZk4zOEYlP8y+6ZakaA8Q= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-418-6Pi82XMgOfO5KpXMVi5ZDg-1; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:45:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6Pi82XMgOfO5KpXMVi5ZDg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-333127febb2so1019903f8f.2 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:45:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701359141; x=1701963941; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zI+KacwTeVOP3vAvbZdYEAoyXrMF1jDG+JSpeeTCGcc=; b=ZXZ0j5o75KIscCgyBk6PnQohdDfY0gqznL17BLcq1Pqb6kf1XgcTHs5Je4Q9+ufFlx 58wTlgRMVUSSf6rnuYTF2SJiZlJtg8mr0je3wS3cYP7+Xy70VNmWzdh7pNffLV/3H6i/ ak3FNFPaJp0EPAz8D7qsZ54QM83sq5ObKX5eC7Nl4vRn2YFG/+jXF/KZgwrH9YcvdbFT ncLAtmpovQMIS+ltJDUS/A40EKUYZuKYTNEnpZ+EMEmZUHLXNbbV07ARy/gdPLFkmXPA algQ/KVS4yUnWCYhu+ljrvCVqeudoKhyAHLGNVI6BRWt8czpNRjnrSWb2hAjgO0iyrNb f+cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIZPXS3Ah4XyUpfHQvhf6GHeqP9jcyEjxI7ZlxydVM9RdIYWMY YPcKPz0iR2YYCnYOpWXgYhLK7pp7C9QORjN29iGaZAuCE6C21qXs+ij4ciIX+KOCx0mU3yQUL/k hB89mxV2oamNc0cc7C3NIUQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef4e:0:b0:331:4e5e:d9e7 with SMTP id c14-20020adfef4e000000b003314e5ed9e7mr15072631wrp.34.1701359141415; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:45:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFFfKbxWqHfEV22ep5ja+P+P4vsw5GKkcd+w9+aDd+NqX+zuNJJGThFz0bpGQde7rFJDXg0Uw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef4e:0:b0:331:4e5e:d9e7 with SMTP id c14-20020adfef4e000000b003314e5ed9e7mr15072616wrp.34.1701359141148; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:45:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.129] (ip-94-112-227-180.bb.vodafone.cz. [94.112.227.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7-20020a5d4527000000b00332fda15056sm1818065wra.110.2023.11.30.07.45.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:45:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:45:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [ PATCH 0/3] Fix GDB reverse execution behavior To: Carl Love , Luis Machado , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi References: <890101c23dd5fa60fcbf9d4b299cb2a533c260b7.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1e702d8f-e5b4-4719-b1e7-42210f350305@arm.com> <643afce1-ab9b-4e8b-bcbb-5738dc409a28@arm.com> <9e17008084c34f953f5318933436ec703250120a.camel@linux.ibm.com> <92a751d1-a4b9-4c21-821e-a1dc67207516@arm.com> <5483d77c72088a1e4d5dfed2eded2366643fc659.camel@linux.ibm.com> <07f044da-94d5-bc7d-7d57-d83e9f179e59@redhat.com> <85a2f33d4ad12966dcb212e99e836175b69fddee.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Guinevere Larsen In-Reply-To: <85a2f33d4ad12966dcb212e99e836175b69fddee.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 30/11/2023 16:39, Carl Love wrote: > Guinevere: > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 12:36 +0100, Guinevere Larsen wrote: >> On a side note, b4 didn't really like this series and I'm not sure >> why. >> My guess is that all 3 patches have the same email subject, but it >> may >> also be that I needed --3way when using git am. Either way, just >> mentioning to gather knowledge on what b4 likes or doesn't like. > > I am not familiar with b4. I just did a Google search and found a > description of it at: > > https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/introducing-b4-and-patch-attestation > > It seems to be a tool the maintainers can use for patch management. I > will have to play around with it and see if I can figure out why b4 > doesn't like the patch series. > > Is this something that people have started using? > We started talking about this because it automatically collects the git trailers and applies them, so you wouldn't need to change your local commits, and makes it easy for reviewers.  Simon wrote some tips about using it in the wiki a little bit ago: https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/DeveloperTips#Downloading_and_applying_patches_from_the_mailing_list It's not required or anything, it's just handy. I like to use it as "b4 shazam " which would automatically apply the patches, not just download them. Maybe that's where it went wrong... -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers