From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23492 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2009 03:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23484 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Sep 2009 03:05:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-px0-f202.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f202.google.com) (209.85.216.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:05:37 +0000 Received: by pxi40 with SMTP id 40so1150594pxi.24 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:05:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.138.7 with SMTP id q7mr216820wfn.314.1253761536095; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:05:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20090916214051.GF8910@adacore.com> <20090922224925.GH8910@adacore.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA/commit] s/nquery/query/ in record.c (was "Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.") To: Marc Khouzam Cc: Joel Brobecker , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00737.txt.bz2 Thanks, Joel and Marc. I think this patch is best for the current status. Thanks, Hui On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 20:44, Marc Khouzam wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org >> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Joel Brobecker >> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:49 PM >> To: Marc Khouzam >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> Subject: [RFA/commit] s/nquery/query/ in record.c (was "Re: >> Another proposal for frontends and queries.") >> >> It seems that the discussion regarding a short-term fix has died, >> so I'm assuming that Hui is OK for now with changing nquery to query. >> >> Here is a patch that I tested on x86_64-linux, no regression. >> Will commit in the head and 7.0 branches in a couple of days pending >> objections. >> >> MarcK, did you write a patch like this one, a while ago. You should >> get credit for it if you did. > > Don't worry about it, as long as Eclipse can use PRecord fully, that's what > I was looking for. > > Thanks a lot for following up on this! > > Marc > >