From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1475 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2009 14:34:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1457 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2009 14:34:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f185.google.com) (209.85.222.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:33:57 +0000 Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so4258596pzk.0 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.24.41 with SMTP id b41mr694189wfj.238.1253111636106; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090916142543.GC8910@adacore.com> References: <200909161425.48262.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20090916142543.GC8910@adacore.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries. To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Marc Khouzam , Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Michael Snyder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 22:25, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> And about the patch I said can handle this issue is "set record query >> " patch. =A0I cannot find who don't like this patch. > > I am one of the maintainers would dislike this idea. Sorry. But I cannot find you your comment to this patch. I just find Eli and Tom's mail. > >> On the other hand, about the nquery. >> Let me talk my idea. =A0The nquery is a function of GDB right? =A0MI is a >> function of GDB too. =A0 Eclipse is a very important soft that support >> GDB. >> If you want change nquery to query, why not remove nquery directly? > > I had the same thoughts, actually. But we have one more usage of that > function relative to pending breakpoints, and for some reason it was > decided that the default was 'n' rather than 'y'. Not sure why. Because it will delete the execution log follow this insn. Thanks, Hui