From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2009 14:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 24903 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2009 14:17:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-px0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:17:27 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so4411221pxi.24 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:17:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.250.21 with SMTP id x21mr630270wfh.321.1253110645061; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:17:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200909161425.48262.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries. To: Marc Khouzam Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Joel Brobecker , Michael Snyder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 >> > >> > >> > How is precord different? >> > >> > We very seriously need a GDB HIG. >> > >> > -- >> >> There is a patch to handle it. =A0I think this way is better. And I have >> said :"If you really cannot handle query with Eclipse, I think this >> patch is OK with me. " > > Yes but some of the maintainers did not really like this solution. > >> BTW, I told Marc begin a new thread to discussion why Eclipse cannot >> handle nquery. =A0What's happen? > > This thread we're in now is this new thread you suggested. > I tried to summarize the issue and go over all the different proposals > (we are up to 4 different solutions). =A0My impression is that the mainta= iners > prefer to change PRecord (which is new) instead of changing the genereal > GDB behaviour with respect to queries (which has been there for a long ti= me). > Thanks for help me clear what happen. Thanks a lot. And about the patch I said can handle this issue is "set record query " patch. I cannot find who don't like this patch. On the other hand, about the nquery. Let me talk my idea. The nquery is a function of GDB right? MI is a function of GDB too. Eclipse is a very important soft that support GDB. If you want change nquery to query, why not remove nquery directly? Thanks, Hui