Thanks Mark. This reason of this issue is because we want close the old record target with record_close that will be called by "push_target (&record_ops);" This line is after "Set the beneath function pointers." So it make "record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint" point to the record_insert_xxx. In 2 months before, I post a patch that change this query to error. I post it again, wish you like it. Thanks, Hui 2009-09-12 Hui Zhu * record.c (record_open): Change "query" to "error". (cmd_record_stop): Change "query" to "printf_unfiltered". --- record.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/record.c +++ b/record.c @@ -436,12 +436,8 @@ record_open (char *name, int from_tty) /* Check if record target is already running. */ if (current_target.to_stratum == record_stratum) - { - if (!nquery - (_("Process record target already running, do you want to delete " - "the old record log?"))) - return; - } + error (_("Process record target already running. Use \"record stop\" to " + "stop record target first.")); /*Reset the beneath function pointers. */ record_beneath_to_resume = NULL; @@ -1157,9 +1153,9 @@ cmd_record_stop (char *args, int from_tt { if (current_target.to_stratum == record_stratum) { - if (!record_list || !from_tty || query (_("Delete recorded log and " - "stop recording?"))) - unpush_target (&record_ops); + unpush_target (&record_ops); + printf_unfiltered (_("Process record is stoped and all execution " + "log is deleted.\n")); } else printf_unfiltered (_("Process record is not started.\n")); On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 22:24, Marc Khouzam wrote: > Hi Hui, > > I see a Segmentation fault when enabling Record when it is already on. > > GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090910-cvs > Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying" > and "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu". > For bug reporting instructions, please see: > ... > Reading symbols from /local/lmckhou/testing/a.out...done. > (gdb) l > 1       int main() > 2       { > 3         int a = 0; > 4         int b = 1; > 5         return 0; > 6       } > (gdb) start > Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x8048415: file a.cc, line 3. > Starting program: /local/lmckhou/testing/a.out > > Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at a.cc:3 > 3         int a = 0; > (gdb) record > (gdb) record > Process record target already running, do you want to delete the old record log?(y or [n]) y > (gdb) n > Segmentation fault > > Here is the backtrace: > (gdb) bt > #0  0xb7d2e449 in _int_malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #1  0xb7d2fce6 in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #2  0x0808f564 in xmalloc (size=16) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1229 > #3  0x0808e585 in make_my_cleanup2 (pmy_chain=0x84003e0, function=0x808e50b , arg=0x8d0cf50, free_arg=0x808f63b ) >    at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:349 > #4  0x0808e571 in make_cleanup_restore_integer (variable=0x8413190) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:340 > #5  0x0822724e in record_gdb_operation_disable_set () at ../../src/gdb/record.c:414 > #6  0x082283aa in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1081 > #7  0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #8  0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #9  0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #10 0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #11 0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #12 0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > #13 0x082283c2 in record_insert_breakpoint (gdbarch=0x848c7d8, bp_tgt=0x84e2aa4) at ../../src/gdb/record.c:1082 > ... > > This continues over and over and over .... > > Thanks > >