From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29743 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2009 04:27:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29734 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Sep 2009 04:27:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-px0-f188.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f188.google.com) (209.85.216.188) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:27:26 +0000 Received: by pxi26 with SMTP id 26so1834579pxi.13 for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.131.6 with SMTP id i6mr430592wfn.338.1252211245083; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090906024935.GD30677@adacore.com> References: <4AA2D95B.4090904@vmware.com> <20090906024935.GD30677@adacore.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] cleanup of syscall consts in process record To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Mark Kettenis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:49, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I think this patch is perfect. =A0It make prec linux code very clear. > > Note that this also settles the argument of signed versus unsigned, > I believe. enum types are represented as an int, right? I just post a new patch for it. Please help me review it. Hui > >> Does it can check in before 7.0 branch? =A0If so, I can update the "Fix >> cygwin build error with i386-linux-tdep.c" follow this patch. > > I don't see a reason why this patch should be applied after 7.0. > I haven't looked at it yet, but it seemed fairly mechanical. > > -- > Joel >