From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1646 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2009 23:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1636 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2009 23:43:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.211.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:43:40 +0000 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so5268780ywh.0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:43:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.16.1 with SMTP id 1mr7686511ybp.284.1251675817516; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:43:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7d77a27d0908301639w3b6e0137l438b0fda32dd0264@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d77a27d0908300813p78945f1cv8597e9ee675e959@mail.gmail.com> <7d77a27d0908301639w3b6e0137l438b0fda32dd0264@mail.gmail.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cygwin build error with i386-linux-tdep.c To: Jiang Jilin Cc: gdb-patches ml , Michael Snyder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 07:39, Jiang Jilin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Hui Zhu wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 23:13, Jiang Jilin wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Hui Zhu wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> =A0 if (tmpu32 > 499) >>>> =A0 =A0 { >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target doe= sn't " >>>> - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "support syscall= number %u\n"), tmpu32); >>>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "support syscall= number %u\n"), (unsigned) tmpu32); >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 return -1; >>>> =A0 =A0 } >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, it's not clear to me. >>> >>> when looking into the code, I found the type of tmpu32 is uint32_t, >>> why did the gcc complain "warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg >>> (arg 2)"? >>> >>> %u doesn't mean unsigned int? >>> >> >> Really? =A0what does it mean? > > I mean without your patch, the type of tmpu32 _is_ uint32_t, why did > gcc complain? and when you cast it to unsigned, the warning > disappeared? > I am not sure the unit32_t in cygwin. But it looks like uint32_t is not unsigned int in cygwin. And "unsigned" is seems "unsigned int". Thanks, Hui