From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66238-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5053 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2009 03:27:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 5045 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2009 03:27:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pz0-f198.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:27:28 +0000
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so2040304pzk.12         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.138.5 with SMTP id q5mr711604wfn.286.1251257246055; Tue,  	25 Aug 2009 20:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <831vmzdzym.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4A7BA1DE.6010103@vmware.com> <daef60380908222129g483ed968sce36e561a0febf2f@mail.gmail.com>  	<837hwufkxr.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908231642h1d85f7b5r70a5856647335f4c@mail.gmail.com>  	<daef60380908231700i47c2b1e7kae31369237b419b4@mail.gmail.com>  	<83eir1dnqw.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908242202y4102ac49xec519769d7e1f3c@mail.gmail.com>  	<8363cbenvt.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908251958u31f379e2oe5839c3a9e826428@mail.gmail.com>  	<831vmzdzym.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <daef60380908252027h1518caf2o47312d07af8cbd14@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in i386_process_record?
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:19, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:58:39 +0800
>> Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> I add some code about it:
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 regcache_raw_read_unsigned (ir.regcache,
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_ES_REGNUM],
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 &es);
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 regcache_raw_read_unsigned (ir.regcache,
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_DS_REGNUM],
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 &ds);
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (ir.aflag && (es !=3D ds))
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 {
>>
>> After that, we will not get the warning because the es is same with ds
>> in user level.
>>
>> What do you think about it?
>
> Sounds good to me.
>

Do you think it's OK to check in?

Hui