From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66209-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15009 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2009 05:04:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 14894 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Aug 2009 05:04:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pz0-f198.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:04:09 +0000
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1377176pzk.12         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.8.24 with SMTP id 24mr461734wfh.337.1251176648078; Mon, 24  	Aug 2009 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83d46ldnoj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4A7BA1DE.6010103@vmware.com> <daef60380908180221u15eabc48x650e7c592be11976@mail.gmail.com>  	<daef60380908202003o56acdb46r731b331be6fee544@mail.gmail.com>  	<4A90B261.2030602@vmware.com> <daef60380908222030k3251e57eha4a8c38c616b6819@mail.gmail.com>  	<4A90C08A.8000107@vmware.com> <daef60380908222129g483ed968sce36e561a0febf2f@mail.gmail.com>  	<837hwufkxr.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908231642h1d85f7b5r70a5856647335f4c@mail.gmail.com>  	<83d46ldnoj.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <daef60380908242203y27d831f1h81d65fe8798fa1ce@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in i386_process_record?
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:19, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:42:41 +0800
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> For the gdb, the value of segment reg is not the really value.
>> cs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x73 =A0 115
>> ss =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x7b =A0 123
>> ds =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x7b =A0 123
>> es =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x7b =A0 123
>> fs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x0 =A0 =A00
>> gs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x33 =A0 51
>> I have tried some insn that use segment reg such as string ops insn.
>> I found that the value of this segment reg cannot affect anything.
>
> Did you try setjmp and longjmp?
>

Signal and setjmp longjump is still not tested.  I will do it.

Thanks,
Hui