Re: Bug in i386_process_record?

Hui Zhu
2009-08-25T05:04:16Z

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:19, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:42:41 +0800
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> For the gdb, the value of segment reg is not the really value.
>> cs             0x73   115
>> ss             0x7b   123
>> ds             0x7b   123
>> es             0x7b   123
>> fs             0x0    0
>> gs             0x33   51
>> I have tried some insn that use segment reg such as string ops insn.
>> I found that the value of this segment reg cannot affect anything.
>
> Did you try setjmp and longjmp?
>

Signal and setjmp longjump is still not tested. I will do it.

Thanks,
Hui