Re: Bug in i386_process_record?

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:29, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:07, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:07, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, please *don't* check this in -- I found a problem with it.
>>>>
>>>> Try running it with "set debug record 1" during the recording pass.
>>>>
>>>> I see a whole lot of these:
>>>>
>>>> Process record ignores the memory change of instruction at address
>>>> 0x0x587be9 because it can't get the value of the segment register.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Most of the string ops instruction will use segment register.
>>> But I check the some linux program that have string ops insn.  I found
>>> that in linux (maybe glibc), the value of the segment register is 0,
>>> so it will not affect anything.
>>
>> Hmm, ok, but this is i386-tdep.c, not i386-linux-tdep.c...
>>
>>> And in linux user level, looks we don't have any good way to get the
>>> value of the segment register.
>>>
>>> So I think this patch is OK.
>>
>> I see -- so, we don't really "ignore" the memory change at all.
>>
>> Isn't the message misleading, then?
>>
>> What about something like:
>>
>> @@ -4458,11 +4458,12 @@ reswitch:
>>           if (ir.aflag)
>>             {
>>               /* addr += ((uint32_t) read_register (I386_ES_REGNUM)) << 4;
>> */
>> -              if (record_debug)
>> -                printf_unfiltered (_("Process record ignores the memory
>> change "
>> -                                     "of instruction at address 0x%s
>> because "
>> -                                     "it can't get the value of the segment
>> "
>> -                                     "register.\n"),
>> +              if (record_debug &&
>> +                 read_register (I386_ES_REGNUM) != 0)
>> +                printf_unfiltered (_("Process record ignores value of ES "
>> +                                     "register for instruction at address
>> %s "
>> +                                     "because "it can't get the value of "
>> +                                     "the segment register.\n"),
>>                                    paddress (gdbarch, ir.addr));
>>             }
>>           if (prefixes & (PREFIX_REPZ | PREFIX_REPNZ))
>>
>
> read_register (I386_ES_REGNUM)
> This value is not the value of ES.  This is number of TLB.  So ....
>
> Hui
>

ES is one of the segment register.

Hui