From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66073-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31029 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 09:11:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 31020 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 09:11:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-px0-f193.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f193.google.com) (209.85.216.193)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:10:57 +0000
Received: by pxi31 with SMTP id 31so1924295pxi.24         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.5.39 with SMTP id 39mr963637wfe.81.1250586656061; Tue, 18  	Aug 2009 02:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380908180206r1f749c61t583d2bf2bb1f8b6a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A875C26.7060302@vmware.com> <daef60380908160912i17b99706p2b46fe93dd80579@mail.gmail.com>  	<daef60380908162034u188a49e6nf0b52531a0584dc2@mail.gmail.com>  	<daef60380908170720g5d03d552u97f11aecbbe5e582@mail.gmail.com>  	<4A89A040.8030405@vmware.com> <daef60380908171601q5ffe735fk193370df3505b1ca@mail.gmail.com>  	<daef60380908180206r1f749c61t583d2bf2bb1f8b6a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:22:00 -0000
Message-ID: <daef60380908180210r280bf835laa7569042e6a5458@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in i386_process_record
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2

About rex in i386:
        case 0x40:
        case 0x41:
        case 0x42:
        case 0x43:
        case 0x44:
        case 0x45:
        case 0x46:
        case 0x47:
        case 0x48:
        case 0x49:
        case 0x4a:
        case 0x4b:
        case 0x4c:
        case 0x4d:
        case 0x4e:
        case 0x4f:
          if (ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_R8_REGNUM])
            {

Only in amd64, ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_R8_REGNUM] is true, so it will not
affect 32bits.

Thanks,
Hui

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 17:06, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried. =A0Everything is OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:01, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:24, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/machinestate.exp: step
>>>>
>>>> I think the fail is because rs didn't step into hide.
>>>
>>> 32bit or 64?
>>> If 64, did you try it after applying my two recent patches?
>>>
>>> Anyway, that is not the only reason it fails.
>>> It fails for me on 32 bit intel.
>>
>> I try amd64 with your new patch in last night, everything is OK.
>>
>> For x86, I try it in prev some day, everything is OK too.
>>
>> This pc don't have the gdb-cvs-head and I cannot connect gdb cvs now.
>> I will try it later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>