From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29108 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 09:06:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 09:06:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-px0-f193.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f193.google.com) (209.85.216.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:06:22 +0000 Received: by pxi31 with SMTP id 31so1922034pxi.24 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.36 with SMTP id c36mr926707wfj.1.1250586381105; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4A875C26.7060302@vmware.com> <4A89A040.8030405@vmware.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug in i386_process_record To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 I tried. Everything is OK. Thanks, Hui On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:01, Hui Zhu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:24, Michael Snyder wrote: >> Hui Zhu wrote: >> >>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/machinestate.exp: step >>> >>> I think the fail is because rs didn't step into hide. >> >> 32bit or 64? >> If 64, did you try it after applying my two recent patches? >> >> Anyway, that is not the only reason it fails. >> It fails for me on 32 bit intel. > > I try amd64 with your new patch in last night, everything is OK. > > For x86, I try it in prev some day, everything is OK too. > > This pc don't have the gdb-cvs-head and I cannot connect gdb cvs now. > I will try it later. > > Thanks, > Hui >