From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: rda build on x86_64
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380908180134n6b32a26cle182cf799f110788@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090818053514.GC28254@gmx.de>
../src/configure --disable-sid --disable-rda --disable-binutils
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:35, Ralf Wildenhues<Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build the full src tree, plain
> ../src/configure
> make
>
> on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (on my way of updating autotools in src).
>
> The build fails like this:
>
> | make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rda/unix'
> | if gcc -L/tmp/build/./ld -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../src/rda/unix -I. -I../../../../src/rda/unix -I../../../../src/rda/unix/../include -Wall -g -O2 -MT linux-target.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/linux-target.Tpo" -c -o linux-target.o ../../../../src/rda/unix/linux-target.c; \
> | then mv -f ".deps/linux-target.Tpo" ".deps/linux-target.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/linux-target.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> | In file included from ../../../../src/rda/unix/linux-target.c:50:
> | ../../../../src/rda/unix/ptrace-target.h:70: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘ptrace_arg3_type’
> | ../../../../src/rda/unix/ptrace-target.h:72: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘ptrace_arg3_type’
> | ../../../../src/rda/unix/linux-target.c:1620:2: error: #error Need a _LINUX_TARGET define for your architecture
> | ../../../../src/rda/unix/linux-target.c: In function ‘linux_next_gg_reg’:
> | ../../../../src/rda/unix/linux-target.c:1643: error: ‘NUM_REGS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Looking at configure.in, x86_64 seems simply not supported. Is a port
> to the new x86_64 architecture planned?
>
> Until then, would it be desirable to let toplevel not configure the rda
> directory on x86_64 to avoid this build error (so the user doesn't have
> to --disable-rda manually)?
>
> Thanks, and please Cc: me on replies,
> Ralf
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-18 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 8:34 Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-18 9:06 ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-08-18 19:14 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-18 16:41 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380908180134n6b32a26cle182cf799f110788@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox