From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28185 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2009 23:02:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28145 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2009 23:02:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:02:07 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so920452wfg.24 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.7.11 with SMTP id 11mr966025wfg.140.1250550125107; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A89A040.8030405@vmware.com> References: <4A875C26.7060302@vmware.com> <4A89A040.8030405@vmware.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug in i386_process_record To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:24, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hui Zhu wrote: > >> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/machinestate.exp: step >> >> I think the fail is because rs didn't step into hide. > > 32bit or 64? > If 64, did you try it after applying my two recent patches? > > Anyway, that is not the only reason it fails. > It fails for me on 32 bit intel. I try amd64 with your new patch in last night, everything is OK. For x86, I try it in prev some day, everything is OK too. This pc don't have the gdb-cvs-head and I cannot connect gdb cvs now. I will try it later. Thanks, Hui