From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4655 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2009 06:28:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 4647 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2009 06:28:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_102,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:27:55 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so52604tib.12 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:27:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.8.5 with SMTP id 5mr56006tih.14.1240468071635; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:27:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1239225742.8871.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090420131751.GA25075@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904200947y2acca97arc1a0fc61530357a0@mail.gmail.com> <20090420170154.GA10112@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904201019g7ba8056bx5e84e6bfdf5935d8@mail.gmail.com> <20090420180352.GA14206@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904201208m95d4585k2b09f6b6fe5edb40@mail.gmail.com> <20090422172517.GA17235@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904221810x24763ecaj4a888927b766e7f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Allow GDB to search for the right libthread_db.so.1 From: Hui Zhu To: Tom Tromey Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches ml , Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:32, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Paul" =3D=3D Paul Pluzhnikov writes: > > Paul> In fact there was a patch to add a warning if we detect > Paul> stripped libpthread.so, as this appears to be a common path > Paul> to non-working GDB: > Paul> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00232.html > Paul> The patch didn't make it, though. > > Did I miss the rejection, or was it just not reviewed? It is not reviewed. > > I've tried to keep track of patches that have gone unreviewed. =A0But, I > do miss some (I missed this one). =A0I recommend that everybody send > pings for patches that go unanswered after some time (1 or 2 weeks). > > I would like us as a group to review all submitted patches before the > release (with the option of choosing to defer a patch, but not its > review, to post-7.0). =A0I don't know if this is achievable, but I > thought I'd toss it out there as a goal. Maybe we can post a mail to let everybody ping their patch that is not revi= ewed. Thanks, Hui