From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32018 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 06:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 32007 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2009 06:42:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.186) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:42:39 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so1683528tib.12 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:42:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.16.9 with SMTP id 9mr59966tip.2.1240382556870; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:42:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Set the default of disassemble-next-line to off From: Hui Zhu To: Tom Tromey Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00582.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:16, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Hui" =3D=3D Hui Zhu writes: > > Hui> -If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determin= e\n\ > Hui> +If AUTO, or there's no line info to determine\n\ > Hui> =A0the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of n= ext\n\ > Hui> =A0instruction instead."), > > It seems to me that this should read: > > =A0 =A0If AUTO, and there's no line info to determine [...] If auto: if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction. if this is line inof, it will output nothing. If on: if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction. if this is line inof, it will display disassembly of the next source line whenexecution of the program being debugged stops. If off, it will output nothing. I have no idea to write it clear. Could you please help me with it? > > The actual code change is fine :-) Thanks, it is checked in. Hui