From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14046 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 12:48:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14037 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 12:48:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_39,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.188) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:48:53 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so464391tib.12 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.57.6 with SMTP id f6mr2582826tia.46.1238676530559; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8 From: Hui Zhu To: Pedro Alves , Marc Khouzam , Michael Snyder , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Eli Zaretskii , Mark Kettenis Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Hi guys, Could you please help me with it? Thanks a lot. :) Hui On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:53, Hui Zhu wrote: > Hi guys, > > Could you please help me with it? > Thanks a lot. =A0:) > > Hui > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 13:33, Hui Zhu wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I am not sure your are reviewing the p record patches or done. >> >> Do you think all of them are ok to in? =A0:) >> >> >> Thanks, >> Hui >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 23:58, Hui Zhu wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> After third time submit, there are a lot of change with process record >>> and replay. =A0So I submit fourth time to make it clear to review. >>> >>> For this time, Most of changes were updated follow cvs head and a lot >>> of format fixes. =A0Patch for target.c was removed. =A0Record.c was >>> updated a lot of parts according to the ideas of Pedro (Much >>> appreciated). >>> Thanks for help of everybody in the maillist. >>> >>> Process record and replay make gdb can record inferior execute log and >>> replay (include reverse debug). >>> Now, it support I386-Linux single-thread inferior native debug. >>> >>> I've divided this patch into eight sections, for ease of review. >>> They group as: >>> 1) Architecture support layer (gdbarch.sh, gdbarch.c, gbarch.h). >>> 2) New stratum of strata in target layer (target.h). >>> 3) Process record and replay target (record.c, record.h, Makefile.in). >>> 4) Process record and replay for Linux (linux-record.c, >>> linux-record.h, Makefile.in, configure.tgt). >>> 5) Event handling (infrun.c). >>> 6) Intel 386 target-dependent stuff (i386-tdep.c, i386-tdep.h). >>> 7) Target-dependent code for GNU/Linux i386 (i386-linux-tdep.c). >>> 8) User interface and documentation. >>> >>> For the NEWS: >>> * Process record and replay >>> >>> =A0In a architecture environment that supports ``process record and >>> =A0replay'', ``process record and replay'' target can record a log of >>> =A0the process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse >>> =A0execute commands. >>> >>> These patches be tested with testsuite gdb.twreverse in branch >>> reverse-20081226-branch. >>> >>> Attachment is the compressed patches package to make get all patches ea= sy. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hui >>> >> >