From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24920 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2009 04:53:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 24911 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2009 04:53:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_39,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:53:07 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so1931658tib.12 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:53:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.90.9 with SMTP id n9mr10769715tib.25.1238561584157; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:53:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8 From: Hui Zhu To: Pedro Alves , Marc Khouzam , Michael Snyder , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Eli Zaretskii , Mark Kettenis Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Hi guys, Could you please help me with it? Thanks a lot. :) Hui On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 13:33, Hui Zhu wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am not sure your are reviewing the p record patches or done. > > Do you think all of them are ok to in? =A0:) > > > Thanks, > Hui > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 23:58, Hui Zhu wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> After third time submit, there are a lot of change with process record >> and replay. =A0So I submit fourth time to make it clear to review. >> >> For this time, Most of changes were updated follow cvs head and a lot >> of format fixes. =A0Patch for target.c was removed. =A0Record.c was >> updated a lot of parts according to the ideas of Pedro (Much >> appreciated). >> Thanks for help of everybody in the maillist. >> >> Process record and replay make gdb can record inferior execute log and >> replay (include reverse debug). >> Now, it support I386-Linux single-thread inferior native debug. >> >> I've divided this patch into eight sections, for ease of review. >> They group as: >> 1) Architecture support layer (gdbarch.sh, gdbarch.c, gbarch.h). >> 2) New stratum of strata in target layer (target.h). >> 3) Process record and replay target (record.c, record.h, Makefile.in). >> 4) Process record and replay for Linux (linux-record.c, >> linux-record.h, Makefile.in, configure.tgt). >> 5) Event handling (infrun.c). >> 6) Intel 386 target-dependent stuff (i386-tdep.c, i386-tdep.h). >> 7) Target-dependent code for GNU/Linux i386 (i386-linux-tdep.c). >> 8) User interface and documentation. >> >> For the NEWS: >> * Process record and replay >> >> =A0In a architecture environment that supports ``process record and >> =A0replay'', ``process record and replay'' target can record a log of >> =A0the process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse >> =A0execute commands. >> >> These patches be tested with testsuite gdb.twreverse in branch >> reverse-20081226-branch. >> >> Attachment is the compressed patches package to make get all patches eas= y. >> >> Thanks, >> Hui >> >