From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25595 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2008 03:23:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25533 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2008 03:23:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:23:17 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1129409tib.12 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.50.19 with SMTP id x19mr4195168tix.53.1227496986754; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.103.3 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:23:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:45:00 -0000 From: teawater To: "Pedro Alves" Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 6/10 Cc: "Michael Snyder" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <200811200214.37330.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811200202.26043.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4924C6D5.5020903@vmware.com> <200811200214.37330.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00633.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:14, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 20 November 2008 02:09:25, Michael Snyder wrote: > >> I do share your knee jerk reaction... >> >> Maybe I "let the cat out of the bag", because it appears >> that the intended meaning of the macro was "are we recording", >> but the implementation is "is this the process_record target". > > I already felt like this before regarding the RECORD_IS_USED macro, > so it was not about the name change. > > Not sure if it's "are we recording" or are we "replaying", or > a mix of both. In any case, could each call site on the common > code be replaced by a new suitable target method/property? Could you give me more message on it? I am not very clear your mean. Thanks, Hui