From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59992-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10603 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2008 04:58:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 10551 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2008 04:58:29 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.185)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:57:54 +0000
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1234664tib.12         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.110.109.12 with SMTP id h12mr1968227tic.56.1226725071832;         Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.110.103.3 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <daef60380811142057t4ddd418fm18f5753a4bc67c08@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:02:00 -0000
From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 3/10
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <ufxlunoo7.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <daef60380811052346k5ce7b477w7ba987c581c18c4c@mail.gmail.com> 	 <uk5bfsezf.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <daef60380811101859qbe97d51q779249de3e171f52@mail.gmail.com> 	 <umyg2o6ye.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <daef60380811140740k63bde85fw1e4e2e03485c22e@mail.gmail.com> 	 <ufxlunoo7.fsf@gnu.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 02:32, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:40:22 +0800
>> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> >> >> +               error (_("Process record: record stop the program."));
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you mean
>> >> >
>> >> >    Process record: program recording stopped.
>> >> >
>> >> > ?
>> >>
>> >> What about "Process record stop inferior."
>> >
>> > I'm not sure.  Can you explain what exactly does this message try to
>> > say?  I will then suggest a better wording.
>>
>> OK. When P record want make inferior stop. It will use this code.
>
> Then I think
>
>  error (_("Process record: inferior program stopped."));
>
>> >> >> +  if (ret < 0)
>> >> >> +    error (_("Process record record message error."));
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you mean something like "Process record error."?  That is, does
>> >> > this happen when some error is encountered inside
>> >> > gdbarch_process_record?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> What about "Process record execute log error"?
>> >
>> > "Error executing process log record"?
>>
>> What about "Process record target record execute log failed"?
>
> I think "Process record: failed to record execution log" is better.
>

Great! Thanks Eli. I will use them. :)

Hui