From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22441 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2008 05:03:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 22312 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2008 05:03:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.188) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:03:07 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1801683tib.12 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.26.20 with SMTP id 20mr8840227tiz.43.1226379784886; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.103.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:03:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:43:00 -0000 From: teawater To: "Eli Zaretskii" Subject: Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 10/10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Thanks Eli. On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 17:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 12:39:44 +0800 >> From: teawater >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> >> +@chapter Recording programs running message and replay it >> > >> > I don't understand this phrase. What did you want to say? what does >> > the word "message" have to do with this feature? >> >> What about "Recording inferior execute log and replay it"? > > If this is the intent, then I suggest simply > > Recording inferior's execution and replaying it > > (The fact that you record execution log is an implementation detail, > and certainly does not need to be stated in the chapter's name.) > OK. I will use it. >> > Is the command "target record" or just "record"? or is the latter an >> > alias of the former? We need to explain all this in the manual, >> > because the @item says "target record", while in the last sentence >> > above you say that the command is "record" >> >> "target record" is the real command. >> "record" is a command call "target record". I want it to be the alias >> of "target record" >> "rec" is a alias of "record". > > The aliases should be described in the manual. OK. I will. > >> What about change "@code{record}" to "@code{target record}"? > > Fine with me. > >> > By the way, I think we need a NEWS entry for this feature. >> > >> >> What about add this: >> >> * Process record and replay >> >> Record inferior execute log and replay it. > > OK, but I think at least one or two more sentences describing the > feature would be nice. > What about this: * Process record and replay In a architecture environment that supports process record and replay, process record and replay target can record a log of the process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse execute commands.