From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59320-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21076 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2008 16:09:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 21068 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2008 16:09:26 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.186)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:08:51 +0000
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so364398tib.12         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.103.5 with SMTP id a5mr3218295tic.2.1224259726153;         Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.42.9 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <daef60380810170908k5eabcfe7k8e77e05111abc81c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:09:00 -0000
From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Displaced stepping just enable in non-stop mode
Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  	brobecker@adacore.com
In-Reply-To: <uk5c7mtg7.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <daef60380810062326u442f166em1b1d2c1120a2c80b@mail.gmail.com> 	 <daef60380810140036t20534913w50af7a1abee46967@mail.gmail.com> 	 <200810160107.42525.pedro@codesourcery.com> <u8wspnekq.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <20081016123422.GA31057@caradoc.them.org> <uzll4mm7q.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <20081016183217.GA27176@caradoc.them.org> 	 <48F7AEF2.4050405@vmware.com> 	 <daef60380810162245g5293f117lb36152bc57564dc7@mail.gmail.com> 	 <uk5c7mtg7.fsf@gnu.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2

I think "set displace-break-insn" is not right.
It will make user think breakpoint insn move to another address.
Actually this function try to don't move breakpoint insn in step.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 18:01, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:45:36 +0800
>> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>, pedro@codesourcery.com,
>>       gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com
>>
>> How about "set step displace"
>>
>> I think "displace" is clear.
>
> It isn't clear to me.  "Displace" means simply "move forcefully".
> What is actually being moved here is the breakpoint instruction, but
> "set step displace" includes no hints for that.
>
> Maybe "set displace-break-insn" or some such.
>