From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9473 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2008 07:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9462 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2008 07:05:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.184) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:04:52 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so2018690tib.12 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.37.3 with SMTP id k3mr1587076tik.36.1224140689613; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.42.9 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:05:00 -0000 From: teawater To: "Eli Zaretskii" Subject: Re: [reverse RFC] Add documentation for process record and replay Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48F63B15.3070705@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 Great! I will change it. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 15:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:09:33 +0800 >> From: teawater >> Cc: "Michael Snyder" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> How about change it to "if the next instruction has the execution log for it"? > > I think this is better: > > if the execution log includes the record for the next instruction, ... >